Dodge Charger

[Chris Pearson]

I'm still a newbie to this site but I'd like some feedback on this image.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid225/p7a3c3b1eaa729556cac8cfb946bb2d83/e7ea4e54.jpg

[Mark Delbrueck]

Can you post a larger image please?

[Todd Corzett]

A larger version can be seen here:
http://www.cpautophoto.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/charger.jpg

I noticed this image on your website this morning. I like the car and the location, lighting, etc... but I don't know about the motion. It seems to me to be added in post, rather than because the car is in motion, but I don't know for sure. The only things that I see that could be slightly distracting is how the horizon matches up with the hood lines... and the mountains come off the roof line.

Overall, I like it!

-Todd...

[Chris Pearson]

Thanks, it's natural blur, nothing added.

It's just a really wide angle pan at a super slow speed. It might look kinda fake, but with that 16-35mm motion does some weird stuff when your 2 ft. away from the bumper. Like the circular motion in the foreground and the sideways motion on the right.

Cool, good to hear.

[Todd Corzett]

it's natural blur, nothing added.
I would have expected to seen more motion in the front wheel... guess I can't be right all the time :o

-Todd...

[Chris Pearson]

I would have expected more spin there too. Especially since the rear is blown way out. But the rear was actually moving sideways because of the hard turn while the front was more flat to the camera. The head light was my focus point. Distance from the camera has a lot to do with it. I guess the only way you can tell it's real is the equal distance of blur in the foreground pavement and the front wheel.

Oh well. I don't know, I just take pictures.:)