PDA

View Full Version : American Le Mans Series Handicapping R10s.


Zerin Dube
08-13-2006, 11:23 AM
How awful would it be for the American Le Mans Series to lose Audi in the series? I don't understand why you would push innovation, then penalize a team for doing it so well. Thoughts?


On 20 August, the Audi Sport squad is busy on "two fronts” once again: While the second-half of the DTM season starts at the Nürburgring, the American Le Mans Series at Road America (USA) already enters its crucial phase at the seventh round of the ten race championship. Dindo Capello and Allan McNish have a 39-point lead before the race in Wisconsin. The two Audi drivers could actually make a decisive early step towards clinching the title there.

However, this will be tough challenge: The American Le Mans Series organisers are attempting to stop the revolutionary Audi R10 TDI prototype’s winning streak by making the competition even more new concessions. At Road America the LM P1 Lolas entered by the Dyson team can race with 65 kilograms less than the Audi R10 TDI. Furthermore, from the following race at Mosport, the Dyson Lolas will be granted a five-litre larger fuel tank. That’s why Audi’s further participation in the American Le Mans Series is under discussion.

The Audi Sport engineers have calculated with computer simulation that ten kilograms at Road America is worth at least two-tenths-of-a-second per lap. Despite being deeply disappointed about the random decisions of the IMSA organisation, the Audi Sport North America team would nevertheless like do everything in its power to achieve a good result also at Road America. The layout of the 4.048-mile circuit approximately 60 miles north of Milwaukee should suit the R10 TDI. It is one of the most fluid and fastest on the calendar.

The predecessor of the R10 TDI, the R8, was in a class of its own at Road America and remained unbeaten at every race there between 2002 and 2005. Last year’s winners Frank Biela and Emanuele Pirro are only two-points behind third placed driver Andy Wallace (Dyson Lola) in the overall standings despite having sat out three races. Dindo Capello won in 2002 at Road America, while the circuit in Wisconsin is new territory for Allan McNish. The race starts at on Sunday, 20 August at 2:00 p.m. local time (9:00 p.m. in Germany) and runs over the classic distance of 2:45 hours.

Quotes before the race at Road America

Dr Wolfgang Ullrich (Head of Audi Motorsport): "To us, the recent regulation changes made by IMSA appear to have been made at random and are unjustified. A year ago hardly anybody could believe that it would be possible to win a race with a diesel powered sportscar. We demonstrated that it is feasible, and thanks to ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ we produced the world’s most state-of-the-art LM P1. We can not accept that our life will now be made artificially difficult. Audi, the manufacturer, which has supported and promoted the ALMS for years and helped to make it what it is today, will only continue its American Le Mans Series programme if there are again stable and consistent rules, like at Le Mans, which also contribute towards justifying manufacturer’s involvement and expenditure.”

Frank Biela (Audi R10 TDI #1): "Road America is a fantastic circuit, which I’m really looking forward to. Emanuele (Pirro) and I had a superb race there last year. It goes without saying that after such a victory you return with a special feeling. The track is a lot of fun to drive, is relatively quick and flowing, which should actually suit our Audi R10 TDI. We can also demonstrate TDI Power on the long straights.”

Emanuele Pirro (Audi R10 TDI #1): "Road America is a beautiful circuit that should allow the R10 TDI to shine. That’s why I’m optimistic for the race. It’s clear that we are competing to help Dindo (Capello) and Allan (McNish) in their fight for the title. We nevertheless want to make a strong showing as we did at Salt Lake City and Portland and obviously win if possible.”

Dindo Capello (Audi R10 TDI #2): "Road America is one of the best circuits on the American Le Mans Series calendar. I’ve only driven there once, but won first time out together with Tom (Kristensen) in 2002 and have fond memories as a consequence. This time around Allan (McNish) and I must drive with one eye on the championship, which means we cannot afford a non-finish and want to score as many points as possible to protect our lead. We might even then have the chance of wrapping up the title early at one of the following races.”

Allan McNish (Audi R10 TDI #2): "I’ve still haven’t raced at Road America. That’s why I spoke to Nigel (Mansell) who described Road America as a ‘real driver’s circuit’, which should suit me. I also got a few tips from Dario Franchitti. The flowing circuit should suit the R10 TDI, however, the LM P2 Porsche and the Dyson Lolas, also favoured by the regulations, are getting stronger and stronger, that’s why I’m expecting another dog fight.”

Dave Maraj (Team Director Team Audi Sport North America): "I look forward to going to Road America; it’s one of my favorite race tracks. The R10 TDI will enjoy stretching its legs on this circuit. One thing is for sure, we all hope to race in cooler temperatures this weekend.”

Morgan J Segal
08-13-2006, 11:58 AM
I don't understand why you would push innovation, then penalize a team for doing it so well. Thoughts?

[/COLOR]

Perhaps I am off base, I don't follow ALMS at all, but why should they let Audi spend more money on development than everyone else and completely dominate? If they don't do something, they run the risk of losing the other teams who will just give up because they can't afford to compete against Audi
There is a fine line between pushing innovation and just out spending (which is what usually happens in motorsport)
The same thing has happened in WRC, Citroen spent way more on development than everyone else, hired the best driver, and they have dominated (so much, they have won nearly every race for the past two years)

Personally, I like the idea of rewards weight that is applied to SWC

John Thawley
08-13-2006, 01:17 PM
The problem, Morgan, is the political mix of sponsorship and competition. ALMS is very dependant on manufacture sponsorship... as well as their competition involvement. The apparent problem their is the appearance of "buying" favoritism from the Series officials. So far, ALMS as done a good job of balancing that.

However, ALMS began tinkering with rules, outside the ACO, in order to attain "competition balance." This path is a very slippery slope at best. Add Series sponsorship to the mix, and I'm afriad you may have just handed the sponsors your balls.

I don't know whether ALMS' tinkering is right or wrong. It may surprise some, but the technical aspects of racing escape me and really don't interest me that much. But, I do know, when you tinker with rules, someone will not be happy.

So, yes.... who spends the most is a problem. But, I'm not sure in this case if it's going to be who spends the most on the track or who spends the most in the sponsorship arena.

This has the potential to be extremely damaging to the health of ALMS at a very critical time in their history.

Austin Langley
08-13-2006, 03:13 PM
I understand why this could be a potential problem in the long run, but It would make for some highly competitive racing. If Audi looses drastically just because of the rule changes, then they should undo the changes. I'm not a big ALMS follower, but when i did attend races, it was a blast! I hope it remains that way.

Todd Corzett
08-13-2006, 05:32 PM
The thing that I like most about sports car racing is the wide variety of manufacturers that are involved. It is not a 'spec' series. While it may not be a 'run what you brung' series, there should really be a balance between the two extremes. You establish a set of rules and you stick with them. Just because one team is winning doesn't mean you should hamstring them (I am bias as an Audi fan though).

Just because Ferrari was dominating F1, did they give concessions to the other teams? Did Minardi get a larger gas tank or less weight so they could be competitive? If you're going to make rules changes... make them to all teams and not during the middle of a title chase. Give it some time and other teams start to come to the plate. IMO, not every car should have a change to win the race every weekend. Even with a spec series... like Champ Car... it doesn't stop Sebastien Bourdais driving away race after race.

Some teams will always be better... even if the cars are identical. If you want someone else to win they need to improve their programs, you shouldn't handicap the winners... at least mid season. If you want to make a rules change, do it at the end of the year at least. When you start throwing rules around that are designed to change the outcome of championships, you are playing with fire!

-Todd...

John Thawley
08-13-2006, 06:33 PM
Todd:

In the end, you make your point. But the F1 analogy is not applicable here.

Personally, I think when it comes to LMP rules, we should be staying closer to the ACO. I understand in GT1 and GT2 the need to tinker.

Of course, ultimately, the Series is left with the challenge of protecting their main assett; the show. If the show is not a show... who's going to watch? But, by the same token, competitors have a right to expect some stability.

Personally, in this situation, I would bring all the LMP1 competitors into a room and simply ask them... "what do you each need to agree to so as we ALL protect our investment. Come in, talk, listen, agree... then sit down and shut up. Let's go racing.

JT